Critical Analysis and Evaluation of “1984” by George Orwell Essay

George Orwell, whose real evoke was Eric Blair, was born in Bengal, India, in 1903. When he was eight geezerhood old, as it was customary, his mother brought him back to England to be educated. He was sent to a embarkment school on the south coast, a school whose students were sons of the upper class. He was in allowed in with lower tuition and non being from a wealthy background, he was subject field to snobbery of the others at the school. In 1917 he went to Eton on a scholarship and he enjoyed himself, making friends and construe many passwords. Orwell graduated in 1921 and instead of going on to a university he joined the genteel Service and went to Burma as a sergeant in the Indian Imperial Police. He served as a policeman in Burma from 1922 until he took leave in 1927 and resigned his post.Orwell forthwith had time to think and he trenchant to live among working-class people in genus Paris and among the tramps in England for more than a year. During these years he worked as a schoolteacher and got married. Both he and his wife kept a village taproom and a village general store. altogether of these experiences led up to the basis for his foremost maintain, Down and Out in Paris and London, which was an autobiographical work he publish in 1933. This was his firstborn adjudge and he utilise the summons George Orwell. He explained by and by that he took the become name from an face river near where he lived and the first name as being typically English.The latter(prenominal) part of his work was pen chiefly about different things and places that he had experienced. For example, he wrote, Homage to Catalonia, from his experiences in the Spanish gracious War and A Clergymans Daughter, builds use of his teaching experiences. Orwell died at the three-year-old age of forty-seven from neglected lungailments. In his death he left merchant ship a growing re localiseation for sizeableness and the conviction that modern man was little to cope with the demands of his hi recital.It is non apparent that Orwell used any sources in his writing of 1984. If he had, they were not included in my likeness of 1984.The Authors ViewsI find oneself that George Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning after(prenominal) years of brooding on the reduplicate menaces of Nazism and Stalinism. He wanted to arrange out the basis of what he plan the world could become. By writing this anti-utopian tosh, I feel he hoped to frighten us so that we might be on our guard. If a certain city knew of a scissure on the rise, they could be prepared. But, if that tornado hit that same town and they were not expecting it, the potential damage could be removed greater. Orwell was warning us.The position the author takes on his story seems to be a encouraging one. He hopes that Winston will end up defeating Oceanias mad system of political sympathies and find true love with Julia exclusively he is not writing a love story. He planted his autho r (the plot) in some nasty soil. The surroundings in which he define his story would only allow for Winston to get so far before liberal pal got the trump of him. He clearly mat sympathy for Winston but he withal wanted to make his point for the book clear. Wintson would bring on to love regretful fellow.1984 In ReviewWinston Smith, a physically unnoticeable man of thirty-nine, is Orwells principal protagonist. He works in the Records department of the Ministry of Truth, rewrite the past as it appears in the newspapers, and he is tired of living under the paternalistic government of Oceania. Waking up both morning in this mad club has turned him slowly into a rebel. He first started writing in a diary, which was looked at with suspicion by the though Police. Writing would record history as it really occurred and this was exactly what the Big Brother did not want.Big Brother is the name of a person that does not exist. He is the major political figure in Oceania that o pposes e precisething Emmanuel Goldstein is about. If one takes the position that the party is correct, than Big Brother becomes God, President and ultimate friend. Goldstein, on the other hand, pcompassed that Big Brother was defective and eventually had to flee from Oceania because of his growing hatred. The videotapes with which he spoke a sop upst Oceanias politics and Big Brother were used in the day-by-day Two-Minute Hates. In this period of time, work ceased and e genuinelyone garner around a telescreen, large, flat television set screens that pervaded Oceania. Goldstein appeared on the telescreen and everyone was to scream and mock this man, for he was not right. A young woman, Julia, instigates a liaison betwixt herself and Winston. Rebelling against Big Brother, they make love, which Winston believes is a severe thoughtcrime.He felt that sexual relationships accompanying love would issuing in a loyalty between individuals that is contrary to the desires of the Party. They then rent an flat and take comfort that OBrien, a vigorous, intelligent man of mysteriously advanced rank in the Inner Party, is their friend. OBrien lets Winston read a seditious book. This book describes the relationships of Oceania with Eastasia and Eurasia. Once OBrien had enough enjoin to convict Winston and Julia, the two were arrested in their rented room. They were immure in the Ministry of Love where OBrien put Winston through the first two stages of his retraining. everyplace the nine months of rehabilitation he larn to love OBrien and they conversed as if friends. The last stage came in the dreaded board 101, where Winston was do to face what he secretly feared most, rats. He betrays Julia and is subjugated physically, mentally, and emotionally. All that ashes is for Winston to love Big Brother.Personal evaluation of Book and AuthorGeorge Orwell is an excellent author. forrader I was introduced with 1984, I read fauna Farm and this gave me a taste for his writing. In both Animal Farm and 1984 alike, Orwells writing was easy to adapt to. His movement of writing helped my deduceing of the book and made it enjoyable. In 1984, he presented a very interesting scenario similar to Nazi Germany. I believethat Orwell put much front into this book and made his story very realistic. As I read along, at that place was nothing which seemed too out of reach or too unbelievable. His protagonist, Winston Smith, was an ordinary citizen in Oceania by appearance but his thoughts and actions were substructure according to Big Brother.Orwell in a sense let me down by letting the worst catch up with Winston and having Big Brother be the last(a) destruction of him. This, though, I feel had to keep to fulfill the authors design for writing the story. He wanted to lay out the humor of an anti-utopian ordering and, I think he hoped by presenting it, that it might not happen. I believe that he fulfilled his purpose in writing the story and that he la id out a warning for the potential dangers of totalitarianism. His book was at first thought to be too extremist but the more it was read and reread, he seemed to be right on target. He proposed a very interesting story with endless possibilities.Reading 1984 was a learnedness experience. I learned the value in speaking out against the majority. I overly learned the danger in allowing groups to gain too much power. When I was reading the book, I forgot some political aspects about W.W.II and I went back to a base I had written on that subject. after reviewing the war, it made me realize how well Orwell set his thoughts out through the book and how he formulated an interesting story. Orwell might not have been the most creative of all authors but I learned that this did not matter. He worked hard on such(prenominal) an elaborate plot that it was not infallible to be that creative. This was a fictional switch of literature and therefore I could not agree or disagree with the fa miliarity I previously knew about the books subject. Though, the book speaks of a society that was remarkably similar to Nazi Germany.I recommend this book to anyone. It was well written and thoughtful I will forever and a day remember its impact on me. The best thing about it was that anyone could pick up this book and get the jest of it. It was not imperative to understand what utopia meant or have any knowledge of W.W.II, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union or to understand the book. As I had said before, I had to refresh my history of W.W.II but this did not hinder me from enjoying the book.